PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Risk Analysis
Optimization
Factor Model
See All Tools
Portfolio Analysis
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
GC=F vs. ^GSPC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


GC=F^GSPC
YTD Return12.86%14.48%
1Y Return21.16%24.20%
3Y Return (Ann)8.40%8.38%
5Y Return (Ann)9.60%13.19%
10Y Return (Ann)5.06%10.74%
Sharpe Ratio1.452.22
Daily Std Dev13.89%11.17%
Max Drawdown-44.36%-56.78%
Current Drawdown-4.36%-0.48%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.0

The correlation between GC=F and ^GSPC is 0.02, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

GC=F vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, GC=F achieves a 12.86% return, which is significantly lower than ^GSPC's 14.48% return. Over the past 10 years, GC=F has underperformed ^GSPC with an annualized return of 5.06%, while ^GSPC has yielded a comparatively higher 10.74% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


200.00%300.00%400.00%500.00%600.00%700.00%800.00%2024FebruaryMarchAprilMayJune
749.84%
261.66%
GC=F
^GSPC

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Gold

S&P 500

Risk-Adjusted Performance

GC=F vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gold (GC=F) and S&P 500 (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GC=F
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for GC=F, currently valued at 1.45, compared to the broader market0.000.501.001.502.001.45
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for GC=F, currently valued at 2.02, compared to the broader market0.001.002.003.002.02
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for GC=F, currently valued at 1.26, compared to the broader market1.001.101.201.301.401.26
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for GC=F, currently valued at 1.78, compared to the broader market0.000.501.001.501.78
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for GC=F, currently valued at 7.26, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.007.26
^GSPC
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for ^GSPC, currently valued at 2.04, compared to the broader market0.000.501.001.502.002.04
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for ^GSPC, currently valued at 2.92, compared to the broader market0.001.002.003.002.92
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for ^GSPC, currently valued at 1.39, compared to the broader market1.001.101.201.301.401.39
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for ^GSPC, currently valued at 1.55, compared to the broader market0.000.501.001.501.55
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for ^GSPC, currently valued at 8.56, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.008.56

GC=F vs. ^GSPC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GC=F Sharpe Ratio is 1.45, which is lower than the ^GSPC Sharpe Ratio of 2.22. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of GC=F and ^GSPC.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.002.502024FebruaryMarchAprilMayJune
1.45
2.04
GC=F
^GSPC

Drawdowns

GC=F vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GC=F drawdown since its inception was -44.36%, smaller than the maximum ^GSPC drawdown of -56.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GC=F and ^GSPC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-6.00%-5.00%-4.00%-3.00%-2.00%-1.00%0.00%2024FebruaryMarchAprilMayJune
-4.36%
-0.48%
GC=F
^GSPC

Volatility

GC=F vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison

Gold (GC=F) has a higher volatility of 4.97% compared to S&P 500 (^GSPC) at 1.78%. This indicates that GC=F's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^GSPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%2024FebruaryMarchAprilMayJune
4.97%
1.78%
GC=F
^GSPC